An inspector can be held liable for which type of actions?

The reasoning behind the selection of this option is rooted in the concept of discretionary acts carried out by inspectors. Discretionary acts refer to decisions made by inspectors where they exercise their judgment in applying the law and making evaluations. When an inspector performs these acts, they are expected to follow established guidelines and procedures, as well as industry standards. Should an inspector's discretion lead to negligence or failure to uphold safety standards, they can be held liable for the consequences of their decisions.

In contrast, actions taken outside of their duties may not impose liability since they are beyond the scope of their professional responsibilities. Similarly, acts done in poor faith, while potentially unethical, do not necessarily equate to liability unless they can be linked to negligence or breaches of duty. Verbal communication could be subject to scrutiny, but liability typically hinges on actions taken rather than words spoken unless miscommunications directly result in identifiable harm or legal breaches. Thus, the core concern centers on the inspector's handling of discretionary acts, which inherently involve the unique judgments they are trained to make within their roles.